<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://humancapitalist.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716</link>
	<description>A blog by Jason Corsello about HR technology, services and outsourcing trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 11:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peopleclick Authoria &#8211; A Perfect Merger or Act of Desperation?</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716&#038;cpage=1#comment-3017</link>
		<dc:creator>Peopleclick Authoria &#8211; A Perfect Merger or Act of Desperation?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716#comment-3017</guid>
		<description>[...] stream that I’m sure became very attractive to Bedford (and as was similar with Sumtotal’s private equity buyers).  But with the talent management market continuing to be a replacement market and talent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stream that I’m sure became very attractive to Bedford (and as was similar with Sumtotal’s private equity buyers).  But with the talent management market continuing to be a replacement market and talent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Birch</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716&#038;cpage=1#comment-2827</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Birch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 06:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716#comment-2827</guid>
		<description>Very insightful article. It will be a while before we see any significant action from PE firms in the HR technology market. The market is still very fragmented and quickly evolving. However, the upside in this market is huge and I see in the neat term a significant uptick in M&amp;A activity that will consolidate the market around 4 - 5 key vendors in the HR technology suite category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very insightful article. It will be a while before we see any significant action from PE firms in the HR technology market. The market is still very fragmented and quickly evolving. However, the upside in this market is huge and I see in the neat term a significant uptick in M&amp;A activity that will consolidate the market around 4 &#8211; 5 key vendors in the HR technology suite category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Limam</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716&#038;cpage=1#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Limam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716#comment-2554</guid>
		<description>Another case in point is  Fidelity&#039;s acqusition of HR Access from IBM in 2003. 7 years on, the company is still not profitable requiring an annual influx of funds from Fidelity. Product Management is in turmoil, with a head of PM changing on average every other year, and business strategy is far from being a model of clarity: full outsourcing? partial outsourcing? Launching the business in North America has been going in fits and starts, unsure whether to wrap it within the existing Fidelity outsourcing business or separate. As for an exit strategy, Oracle has been approached to buy it but the bad blood between Fidelity chairman Johnson and LArry Ellison (whose Oracle product by the way powers Fidelity North America outsourcing services) makes this an unlikely event. SAP? maybe? Especially since both are competing furiously for the largest IT projects in France, offering a payroll solution to all government employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another case in point is  Fidelity&#8217;s acqusition of HR Access from IBM in 2003. 7 years on, the company is still not profitable requiring an annual influx of funds from Fidelity. Product Management is in turmoil, with a head of PM changing on average every other year, and business strategy is far from being a model of clarity: full outsourcing? partial outsourcing? Launching the business in North America has been going in fits and starts, unsure whether to wrap it within the existing Fidelity outsourcing business or separate. As for an exit strategy, Oracle has been approached to buy it but the bad blood between Fidelity chairman Johnson and LArry Ellison (whose Oracle product by the way powers Fidelity North America outsourcing services) makes this an unlikely event. SAP? maybe? Especially since both are competing furiously for the largest IT projects in France, offering a payroll solution to all government employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HireLabs Blog</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716&#038;cpage=1#comment-2504</link>
		<dc:creator>HireLabs Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 10:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716#comment-2504</guid>
		<description>[...] Partners has been one firm that has take interest in HR over the years.&#160;humancapitalist.com, The Human Capitalist &#187; How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management?, Jul [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Partners has been one firm that has take interest in HR over the years.&nbsp;humancapitalist.com, The Human Capitalist &raquo; How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management?, Jul [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peHUB &#187; peHUB Second Opinion 7.28</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716&#038;cpage=1#comment-2496</link>
		<dc:creator>peHUB &#187; peHUB Second Opinion 7.28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716#comment-2496</guid>
		<description>[...] An Outsiders Point of View: Is private equity good for technology vendors? (Human Capitalist) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Outsiders Point of View: Is private equity good for technology vendors? (Human Capitalist) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Holincheck</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716&#038;cpage=1#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Holincheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>There are a couple of other examples of private equity acquisitions:  KKR acquiring NorthgateArinso and Thomas H. Lee (THL) Partners/Fidelity National Financial (FNF) acquiring Ceridian.  I think you point out correctly the typical ambitions of private equity firms.  The one thing you did not touch on is that they typically acquire more than one organization in attempt to put together a new organization that has higher value for the exit events you discussed.  A good example, though they have not had an exit yet, is Infor, owned by Golden Gate Capital.  As Bill points out, Vista owns a few HCM properties.  It will be interesting to see how they move forward with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple of other examples of private equity acquisitions:  KKR acquiring NorthgateArinso and Thomas H. Lee (THL) Partners/Fidelity National Financial (FNF) acquiring Ceridian.  I think you point out correctly the typical ambitions of private equity firms.  The one thing you did not touch on is that they typically acquire more than one organization in attempt to put together a new organization that has higher value for the exit events you discussed.  A good example, though they have not had an exit yet, is Infor, owned by Golden Gate Capital.  As Bill points out, Vista owns a few HCM properties.  It will be interesting to see how they move forward with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Corsello</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716&#038;cpage=1#comment-2494</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Corsello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716#comment-2494</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bill and great article this month.  Thanks for mentioning Cyborg, now Accero.  Another one I didn&#039;t mention is Ceridian&#039;s buyout by Thomas H. Lee Partners back in 2007.

The private equity model has definitely changed over the past few years. I didn&#039;t mention that some private equity firms have take equity stakes (not controlling stakes) in some vendors recently notably Halogen Software and The Right Thing (with AIRS).  This type of growth capital has been typically the playground for venture capital firms not private equity.  

I guess it shows that many of the lines are blurring when it comes to choosing the right investor/partner.  Hence why I think its important for customers to understand what the ownership structure looks like with their HR vendors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bill and great article this month.  Thanks for mentioning Cyborg, now Accero.  Another one I didn&#8217;t mention is Ceridian&#8217;s buyout by Thomas H. Lee Partners back in 2007.</p>
<p>The private equity model has definitely changed over the past few years. I didn&#8217;t mention that some private equity firms have take equity stakes (not controlling stakes) in some vendors recently notably Halogen Software and The Right Thing (with AIRS).  This type of growth capital has been typically the playground for venture capital firms not private equity.  </p>
<p>I guess it shows that many of the lines are blurring when it comes to choosing the right investor/partner.  Hence why I think its important for customers to understand what the ownership structure looks like with their HR vendors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Kutik</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716&#038;cpage=1#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Kutik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>Nice commentary, Jason, but you left out Vista Equity Partners&#039; previous acquisition: Cyborg, now renamed Accero. I cover that situation in my current column: http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/story.jsp?storyId=236798821

Also, historically PE firms were known as patient investors with a long horizon because their money came from private individuals (hence the name) and pension funds who only needed returns as their employees retired. That has changed for some firms.

Had lunch with a Vista partner recently in San Francisco who claimed they tend to hold their investment from seven-to-eight years, which is certainly longer than your average VC.

We&#039;ll see how it all shakes out. Certainly you are correct that they invest when they see a company could make a lot more money that it is now. Whether the path to that includes improving the product -- as well as cutting costs -- remains to be seen.

Kronos CEO Aron Ain has nothing but good things to say about his relatively new PE owners, but of course, they are his boss!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice commentary, Jason, but you left out Vista Equity Partners&#8217; previous acquisition: Cyborg, now renamed Accero. I cover that situation in my current column: <a href="http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/story.jsp?storyId=236798821" rel="nofollow">http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/story.jsp?storyId=236798821</a></p>
<p>Also, historically PE firms were known as patient investors with a long horizon because their money came from private individuals (hence the name) and pension funds who only needed returns as their employees retired. That has changed for some firms.</p>
<p>Had lunch with a Vista partner recently in San Francisco who claimed they tend to hold their investment from seven-to-eight years, which is certainly longer than your average VC.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see how it all shakes out. Certainly you are correct that they invest when they see a company could make a lot more money that it is now. Whether the path to that includes improving the product &#8212; as well as cutting costs &#8212; remains to be seen.</p>
<p>Kronos CEO Aron Ain has nothing but good things to say about his relatively new PE owners, but of course, they are his boss!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reBlog from humancapitalist.com:How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management? &#171; lrnr</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716&#038;cpage=1#comment-2492</link>
		<dc:creator>reBlog from humancapitalist.com:How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management? &#171; lrnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716#comment-2492</guid>
		<description>[...] Partners has been one firm that has take interest in HR over the years. humancapitalist.com, The Human Capitalist » How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management?, Jul [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Partners has been one firm that has take interest in HR over the years. humancapitalist.com, The Human Capitalist » How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management?, Jul [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reBlog from humancapitalist.com: The Human Capitalist » How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management? &#171; lrnr</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716&#038;cpage=1#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>reBlog from humancapitalist.com: The Human Capitalist » How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management? &#171; lrnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=716#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>[...] Partners has been one firm that has take interest in HR over the years.&#160;humancapitalist.com, The Human Capitalist &#187; How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management?, Jul [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Partners has been one firm that has take interest in HR over the years.&nbsp;humancapitalist.com, The Human Capitalist &raquo; How Important is Private Equity in Human Capital and Talent Management?, Jul [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

