<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peopleclick Authoria - A Perfect Merger or Act of Desperation?</title>
	<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725</link>
	<description>A blog by Jason Corsello about HR technology, services and outsourcing trends</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Allen</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2986</link>
		<author>Chuck Allen</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2986</guid>
					<description>Peopleclick is built on a .NET architecture? Is this true? I thought they had migrated off of .NET a few years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peopleclick is built on a .NET architecture? Is this true? I thought they had migrated off of .NET a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin W. Grossman</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2987</link>
		<author>Kevin W. Grossman</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 15:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2987</guid>
					<description>I can still hear Vurv, Unicru and PeopleSoft customers crying out in the night.

Excellent analysis, Jason, and I do hope they can pull off the integration while keeping their customer bases happy and tended to, but as you said, in this market it's gonna be tough.  There are too many established and new niche TA and TM players that can nimbly and cost-effectively meet the needs of SMB - a big ol' swath of available business.

And then there are those still swimming up Workstream.  Or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can still hear Vurv, Unicru and PeopleSoft customers crying out in the night.</p>
<p>Excellent analysis, Jason, and I do hope they can pull off the integration while keeping their customer bases happy and tended to, but as you said, in this market it&#8217;s gonna be tough.  There are too many established and new niche TA and TM players that can nimbly and cost-effectively meet the needs of SMB - a big ol&#8217; swath of available business.</p>
<p>And then there are those still swimming up Workstream.  Or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peopleclick and Authoria Combine In Merger : ERE.net</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2989</link>
		<author>Peopleclick and Authoria Combine In Merger : ERE.net</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2989</guid>
					<description>[...] integration may prove a daunting task, suggests Jason Corsello, VP at Knowledge Infusion. In a posting on his blog, The Human Capitalist, Corsello says that &#8220;On paper, the merger makes sense.&#8221; But, he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] integration may prove a daunting task, suggests Jason Corsello, VP at Knowledge Infusion. In a posting on his blog, The Human Capitalist, Corsello says that &#8220;On paper, the merger makes sense.&#8221; But, he [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Birch</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2990</link>
		<author>Mark Birch</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2990</guid>
					<description>This analysis is spot on. Having seen several acquisitions over the years (including PeopleSoft), I can tell you that PeopleClick customers are going to suffer dearly. The reality is this is a financial deal and the integration of technology is an afterthought.

As for the marketplace, this will be the year that many TM / TA vendors disappear. The market has too many players that are undercapitalized but with decent revenue, some cash, and stable customer bases. This is too enticing a market for PE's to ignore in 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This analysis is spot on. Having seen several acquisitions over the years (including PeopleSoft), I can tell you that PeopleClick customers are going to suffer dearly. The reality is this is a financial deal and the integration of technology is an afterthought.</p>
<p>As for the marketplace, this will be the year that many TM / TA vendors disappear. The market has too many players that are undercapitalized but with decent revenue, some cash, and stable customer bases. This is too enticing a market for PE&#8217;s to ignore in 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Spring</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2991</link>
		<author>Joel Spring</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2991</guid>
					<description>Bedford Funding: Home of the Land of the Misfit Toys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bedford Funding: Home of the Land of the Misfit Toys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne Achille</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2994</link>
		<author>Jeanne Achille</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-2994</guid>
					<description>It'll be curious to check back on the market impact of this merger two years from now.  Authoria has done a great job reinventing itself (please tell me I'm not the only one left who remembers the Foundation Technologies days) and PeopleClick is a well respected recruiting vendor. But - to Jason's point - the mismash of technologies and UI issues are in direct contradiction to where the market is going and what the customer expects: ease of use, a clean UI and as little impact on already burdened IT departments as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be curious to check back on the market impact of this merger two years from now.  Authoria has done a great job reinventing itself (please tell me I&#8217;m not the only one left who remembers the Foundation Technologies days) and PeopleClick is a well respected recruiting vendor. But - to Jason&#8217;s point - the mismash of technologies and UI issues are in direct contradiction to where the market is going and what the customer expects: ease of use, a clean UI and as little impact on already burdened IT departments as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Miegel</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3001</link>
		<author>Alan Miegel</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 14:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3001</guid>
					<description>lFrom what we've seen the Authoria has continued to struggle even after the Bedford infusion and I would imagine the combined entity will continue to struggle in the short and mid term. That being said, Bedford certainly isn't done - they have a vision for where this should go and they'll be picking up other struggling companies that compliment Peopleclick Authoria and can be packaged together. I'm pretty sure they don't care about the business at all, just the metrics.  They got great prices on both companies (less than 2x revenue total) and once the market turns around the multiples will go back to 3-4x revenue. Bedford will do great financially but the employees at both companies and more importantly the customers won't see much if any of the benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lFrom what we&#8217;ve seen the Authoria has continued to struggle even after the Bedford infusion and I would imagine the combined entity will continue to struggle in the short and mid term. That being said, Bedford certainly isn&#8217;t done - they have a vision for where this should go and they&#8217;ll be picking up other struggling companies that compliment Peopleclick Authoria and can be packaged together. I&#8217;m pretty sure they don&#8217;t care about the business at all, just the metrics.  They got great prices on both companies (less than 2x revenue total) and once the market turns around the multiples will go back to 3-4x revenue. Bedford will do great financially but the employees at both companies and more importantly the customers won&#8217;t see much if any of the benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TF</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3004</link>
		<author>TF</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3004</guid>
					<description>Re the .NET vs J2EE comment at Peopleclick...I left the company in 2004, just after the initiative to convert to J2EE had started under then CTO Steve Kim.  Kim left the company some time later, and the J2EE product was basically scrapped per some of my friends still inside the organization.

IMHO, it was a tremendously poor decision to attempt the migration to J2EE.  A massive waste of time and money, without question.  From a development perspective, Peopleclick had always been a Microsoft technology house, and had embarked on an initiative to move from traditional VB to .NET.  Kim's decision to totally ignore the company's knowledge base in MS technology was a foolish attempt for a new officer-level recruit to put his mark on the company.  

There is absolutely nothing wrong with J2EE - I'm not advocating that at all.  It was just the wrong fit for that organization.  Cooler heads prevailed, but not after year of struggle and waste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the .NET vs J2EE comment at Peopleclick&#8230;I left the company in 2004, just after the initiative to convert to J2EE had started under then CTO Steve Kim.  Kim left the company some time later, and the J2EE product was basically scrapped per some of my friends still inside the organization.</p>
<p>IMHO, it was a tremendously poor decision to attempt the migration to J2EE.  A massive waste of time and money, without question.  From a development perspective, Peopleclick had always been a Microsoft technology house, and had embarked on an initiative to move from traditional VB to .NET.  Kim&#8217;s decision to totally ignore the company&#8217;s knowledge base in MS technology was a foolish attempt for a new officer-level recruit to put his mark on the company.  </p>
<p>There is absolutely nothing wrong with J2EE - I&#8217;m not advocating that at all.  It was just the wrong fit for that organization.  Cooler heads prevailed, but not after year of struggle and waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Corsello</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3005</link>
		<author>Jason Corsello</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3005</guid>
					<description>Thanks Tom for weighing in.  That is exactly my understanding as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tom for weighing in.  That is exactly my understanding as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peopleclick Authoria: My Take &#171; HCM Tech Vista</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3006</link>
		<author>Peopleclick Authoria: My Take &#171; HCM Tech Vista</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 18:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3006</guid>
					<description>[...] Corsello has put together a post dissecting the deal here that provides some great content and insight (although he did trigger one of my major grammatical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Corsello has put together a post dissecting the deal here that provides some great content and insight (although he did trigger one of my major grammatical [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3007</link>
		<author>Ed</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3007</guid>
					<description>What do you get when you combine a YUGO and a Lexus.... PeopleClick Authoria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you get when you combine a YUGO and a Lexus&#8230;. PeopleClick Authoria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3009</link>
		<author>Natalie</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 19:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3009</guid>
					<description>Great thread and comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thread and comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random Thoughts from The HR Technologist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Next to fall&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3010</link>
		<author>Random Thoughts from The HR Technologist &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Next to fall&#8230;.</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3010</guid>
					<description>[...] the formal analysis of the deal to the analysts (BTW, Jason Corsello has a great post here &#8211; http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725), but the deal does raise a few questions in my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the formal analysis of the deal to the analysts (BTW, Jason Corsello has a great post here &#8211; <a href="http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725" rel="nofollow">http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725</a>), but the deal does raise a few questions in my [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Snyder</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3012</link>
		<author>Martin Snyder</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3012</guid>
					<description>The comments on this item are great- meaty and adding to the value of the blog post.    When stuff like this happens having bloggers like Jason on the job can really bring the true picture into focus. 

From my seat at (below) street level in this business, I have always been impressed with Authoria's contextual vision for UI and unimpressed with everything about Peopleclick except its AA consulting business.  

Kevin sweet comment and I think its pretty clear that Peopleclick customers will be moving into some new technology a la the Vurv story at some point not too far into the future.   

I hear year in and year out about overburdened IT people and keeping any more work away from them,  but I think in truth its more about avoiding tech-weenies and their great big worlds of  "no"  than worrying about their workloads. 

Running apps in already humming datacenters just aint that much work esp. with good vendor support.  

It all reminds me of   First Citywide Change Bank: how do you make money ?   Simple:  Volume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comments on this item are great- meaty and adding to the value of the blog post.    When stuff like this happens having bloggers like Jason on the job can really bring the true picture into focus. </p>
<p>From my seat at (below) street level in this business, I have always been impressed with Authoria&#8217;s contextual vision for UI and unimpressed with everything about Peopleclick except its AA consulting business.  </p>
<p>Kevin sweet comment and I think its pretty clear that Peopleclick customers will be moving into some new technology a la the Vurv story at some point not too far into the future.   </p>
<p>I hear year in and year out about overburdened IT people and keeping any more work away from them,  but I think in truth its more about avoiding tech-weenies and their great big worlds of  &#8220;no&#8221;  than worrying about their workloads. </p>
<p>Running apps in already humming datacenters just aint that much work esp. with good vendor support.  </p>
<p>It all reminds me of   First Citywide Change Bank: how do you make money ?   Simple:  Volume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peopleclick and Authoria Combine In Merger &#124; FixCV.com</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3020</link>
		<author>Peopleclick and Authoria Combine In Merger &#124; FixCV.com</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3020</guid>
					<description>[...] integration may prove a daunting task, suggests Jason Corsello, VP at Knowledge Infusion. In a posting on his blog, The Human Capitalist, Corsello says that &#8220;On paper, the merger makes sense.&#8221; But, he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] integration may prove a daunting task, suggests Jason Corsello, VP at Knowledge Infusion. In a posting on his blog, The Human Capitalist, Corsello says that &#8220;On paper, the merger makes sense.&#8221; But, he [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Crispin</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3025</link>
		<author>Gerry Crispin</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3025</guid>
					<description>Jason, you've got an instructive and well managed set of comments here to accompany a solid blog- no flames, all rational and well considered. I'm considering that in addition to the consolidation you are noting, there may be a growing maturity that will benefit the  employer decision processes. (Then again I may be speaking too soon). Best to you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, you&#8217;ve got an instructive and well managed set of comments here to accompany a solid blog- no flames, all rational and well considered. I&#8217;m considering that in addition to the consolidation you are noting, there may be a growing maturity that will benefit the  employer decision processes. (Then again I may be speaking too soon). Best to you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gold</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3026</link>
		<author>Peter Gold</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 11:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3026</guid>
					<description>Jason

Excellent post and synopsis.  I think any tech merger is a stew and this will be no different but what option did either have?  We are now beginning to see more TM vendors than pure play e-recruitment yet the TM market is still very immature and they are all betting on TM being the answer - which I get.

Let's bookmark this post to 2012 and look back then :)

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason</p>
<p>Excellent post and synopsis.  I think any tech merger is a stew and this will be no different but what option did either have?  We are now beginning to see more TM vendors than pure play e-recruitment yet the TM market is still very immature and they are all betting on TM being the answer - which I get.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s bookmark this post to 2012 and look back then <img src='http://humancapitalist.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Corsello</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3027</link>
		<author>Jason Corsello</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3027</guid>
					<description>@Gerry - thanks for your comments.  best to you.

@Peter - I always enjoy looking back at my posts.  I wish Bedford luck in blending the 2 companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gerry - thanks for your comments.  best to you.</p>
<p>@Peter - I always enjoy looking back at my posts.  I wish Bedford luck in blending the 2 companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellington Financial Blog - News, Views &#38; Purviews &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Bedford Funding shoots the lights out</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3028</link>
		<author>Wellington Financial Blog - News, Views &#38; Purviews &#187; Blog Archives &#187; Bedford Funding shoots the lights out</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3028</guid>
					<description>[...] from one industry analyst: From a pure financial perspective, assuming Peopleclick is a profitable, $60m revenue company, the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] from one industry analyst: From a pure financial perspective, assuming Peopleclick is a profitable, $60m revenue company, the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregg dourgarian</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3032</link>
		<author>gregg dourgarian</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 14:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3032</guid>
					<description>Odd the way some comment about .net and j2ee as if that were the grand dichotomy of software development today.  

For a real Leno/Conan brawl html5 vs Silverlight makes for more fun.  Throw in AdobeAir for comic relief.  And that's just the UI.  

I love it when private equity gets involved w my competitors.  Great analysis in this post and comments. Tx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd the way some comment about .net and j2ee as if that were the grand dichotomy of software development today.  </p>
<p>For a real Leno/Conan brawl html5 vs Silverlight makes for more fun.  Throw in AdobeAir for comic relief.  And that&#8217;s just the UI.  </p>
<p>I love it when private equity gets involved w my competitors.  Great analysis in this post and comments. Tx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3041</link>
		<author>Greg</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://humancapitalist.com/?p=725#comment-3041</guid>
					<description>Financially driven mergers are so abundant right now, leaving people lost in the transition jobless and out of luck. This is a shame to hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Financially driven mergers are so abundant right now, leaving people lost in the transition jobless and out of luck. This is a shame to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
