Peopleclick Authoria – A Perfect Merger or Act of Desperation?

34 comments

image Today, Authoria announce the merger with Peopleclick to create Peopleclick Authoria.  Bedford Funding, the private equity firm that owns Authoria is spending $100 million to acquire and merge the companies.  I’d love to say I had my crystal ball out when we recorded the Bill Kutik Radio Show a few weeks ago and predicted further market consolidation but this wasn’t one of the acquisitions I would have predicted.  Nonetheless, I do believe it is an early indication of what we can expect in 2010 – market consolidation.

The Good News

On paper, the merger makes sense.  It now puts Peopleclick Authoria as the #3 vendor in terms of market share (with Taleo #1 and SuccessFactors #2).  It also brings together one of the deepest talent acquisition vendors (Peopleclick) with one of the most robust talent management vendors (Authoria).  Although Authoria can claim talent acquisition capabilities today (via the acquisition of Hire.com), they are primarily limited to salaried recruiting only.  With Peopleclick, they now add hourly and contingent recruiting, onboarding, EEO/compliance solutions, candidate relationship management (CRM), and vendor management capabilities.  Peopleclick also give Authoria global presence which they really didn’t have previously.   As I recently noted, Peopleclick was newly recognized on the Gartner e-Recruitment Magic Quadrant, a significant accomplishment for the company.

From a pure financial perspective, assuming Peopleclick is a profitable, $60m revenue company, the $100m investment appears to be money well-spent.  Considering Taleo paid $128 million, or a 2.8x multiple of revenue, for Vurv 2 years ago (yes…I understand the market was much different 2 years ago), a 1.6x multiple for Peopleclick makes great financial sense. 

Lastly, Charles Jones, Managing Partner for Bedford Funding, and now Chairman and CEO of the combined company, has a strong track record for acquiring and merging companies.  If you really think about it, Peopleclick Authoria is the merger of 9 companies (6 with Peopleclick and 3 with Authoria) with a total investment over $130 million in venture investment.

The Bad News

The merger of Peopleclick and Authoria appears to be primarily a financially-driven merger.  Private equity firms like Bedford Funding focus on finding undervalued companies, putting in place some operational and financial discipline, and reselling those companies or assets at a premium.

Although they are now have arguably some of the deepest best of breed solutions for talent acquisition and talent management, the two products couldn’t be more different.   Most of Authoria’s products have recently been re-platforming their solution with a J2EE-based architecture (Authoria Communications has yet to be migrated to the new platform).  Authoria 10x, the new platform, has a streamlined and intuitive user experience. 

Conversely, Peopleclick is built on a .NET architecture and the discrete products have gone through varied levels of “modernization”.   Peopleclick’s usability, although intuitive, are process-driven and require significant user interaction.  Over the past few years, Peopleclick has some useful innovations including contact management, onboarding, interview scheduling and social network integration.  The core recruiting management engine though is still dependent on the deliberate complex that still overwhelms most recruiter or user.  What all of this means for either company’s customers is that Peopleclick products and Authoria products look different, act different, deploy different and demand a completely different user experience.  It also mean the distinct architectures will have integration challenges and longer-term cost implications.

No doubt the companies have very complimentary functionality and Peopleclick Authoria will get into many short-lists due to their “RFP-ready” capabilities (“RFP-ready” meaning they can now checkbox the capabilities listed in most generic RFPs out there).  The question, though, is will the depth of capabilities meet the needs of today’s buyer that demands a simplified and unified experience across all talent processes.  The combined Peopleclick Authoria is a technology stew.  Although both product lines are designed with multi-tenancy in mind, I would consider both vendors to be more hosted providers than true SaaS vendors.  Peopleclick Authoria will need to support many product lines, and many versions of those product lines, deployed uniquely across many customers.  Peopleclick Authoria will be challenged to economically support new innovation and deep customer support for all combined products!  The company has yet to share how they intent to integrate the product lines but considering it has taken Authoria 3+ years to re-platform their solutions, it would be a safe bet to assume the products will remain independent on their separate technology stacks and integration will be at the surface only.  While many other vendors will be focused on deepening the unification of their modules, building capability to support emerging “blended” talent management capability such as talent mobility and planning, and innovating in new areas such as social collaboration, Peopleclick Authoria will be focused on the often painful process of blending two companies and the unique complexities of their underlying technology. 

Authoria is getting a great customer base and an annuity stream that I’m sure became very attractive to Bedford (and as was similar with Sumtotal’s private equity buyers).  But with the talent management market continuing to be a replacement market and talent management buyers become increasingly demanding and cost-conscious, it will be no small task to successful managing the combined Peopleclick Authoria.

Will Peopleclick Authoria be good for customers?  Please share your thoughts and comments.

  • http://www.linkedin.com/in/chuckanc Chuck Allen

    Peopleclick is built on a .NET architecture? Is this true? I thought they had migrated off of .NET a few years ago.

  • http://hrmarketer.blogspot.com/ Kevin W. Grossman

    I can still hear Vurv, Unicru and PeopleSoft customers crying out in the night.

    Excellent analysis, Jason, and I do hope they can pull off the integration while keeping their customer bases happy and tended to, but as you said, in this market it’s gonna be tough. There are too many established and new niche TA and TM players that can nimbly and cost-effectively meet the needs of SMB – a big ol’ swath of available business.

    And then there are those still swimming up Workstream. Or not.

  • Pingback: Peopleclick and Authoria Combine In Merger : ERE.net

  • http://www.wingspreadco.com Mark Birch

    This analysis is spot on. Having seen several acquisitions over the years (including PeopleSoft), I can tell you that PeopleClick customers are going to suffer dearly. The reality is this is a financial deal and the integration of technology is an afterthought.

    As for the marketplace, this will be the year that many TM / TA vendors disappear. The market has too many players that are undercapitalized but with decent revenue, some cash, and stable customer bases. This is too enticing a market for PE’s to ignore in 2010.

  • Joel Spring

    Bedford Funding: Home of the Land of the Misfit Toys.

  • http://www.devonpr.com Jeanne Achille

    It’ll be curious to check back on the market impact of this merger two years from now. Authoria has done a great job reinventing itself (please tell me I’m not the only one left who remembers the Foundation Technologies days) and PeopleClick is a well respected recruiting vendor. But – to Jason’s point – the mismash of technologies and UI issues are in direct contradiction to where the market is going and what the customer expects: ease of use, a clean UI and as little impact on already burdened IT departments as possible.

  • Alan Miegel

    lFrom what we’ve seen the Authoria has continued to struggle even after the Bedford infusion and I would imagine the combined entity will continue to struggle in the short and mid term. That being said, Bedford certainly isn’t done – they have a vision for where this should go and they’ll be picking up other struggling companies that compliment Peopleclick Authoria and can be packaged together. I’m pretty sure they don’t care about the business at all, just the metrics. They got great prices on both companies (less than 2x revenue total) and once the market turns around the multiples will go back to 3-4x revenue. Bedford will do great financially but the employees at both companies and more importantly the customers won’t see much if any of the benefit.

  • TF

    Re the .NET vs J2EE comment at Peopleclick…I left the company in 2004, just after the initiative to convert to J2EE had started under then CTO Steve Kim. Kim left the company some time later, and the J2EE product was basically scrapped per some of my friends still inside the organization.

    IMHO, it was a tremendously poor decision to attempt the migration to J2EE. A massive waste of time and money, without question. From a development perspective, Peopleclick had always been a Microsoft technology house, and had embarked on an initiative to move from traditional VB to .NET. Kim’s decision to totally ignore the company’s knowledge base in MS technology was a foolish attempt for a new officer-level recruit to put his mark on the company.

    There is absolutely nothing wrong with J2EE – I’m not advocating that at all. It was just the wrong fit for that organization. Cooler heads prevailed, but not after year of struggle and waste.

  • Jason Corsello

    Thanks Tom for weighing in. That is exactly my understanding as well.

  • Pingback: Peopleclick Authoria: My Take « HCM Tech Vista

  • Ed

    What do you get when you combine a YUGO and a Lexus…. PeopleClick Authoria.

  • http://www.pchousing.com Natalie

    Great thread and comments!

  • Pingback: Random Thoughts from The HR Technologist » Blog Archive » Next to fall….

  • http://www.pcrecruiter.com Martin Snyder

    The comments on this item are great- meaty and adding to the value of the blog post. When stuff like this happens having bloggers like Jason on the job can really bring the true picture into focus.

    From my seat at (below) street level in this business, I have always been impressed with Authoria’s contextual vision for UI and unimpressed with everything about Peopleclick except its AA consulting business.

    Kevin sweet comment and I think its pretty clear that Peopleclick customers will be moving into some new technology a la the Vurv story at some point not too far into the future.

    I hear year in and year out about overburdened IT people and keeping any more work away from them, but I think in truth its more about avoiding tech-weenies and their great big worlds of “no” than worrying about their workloads.

    Running apps in already humming datacenters just aint that much work esp. with good vendor support.

    It all reminds me of First Citywide Change Bank: how do you make money ? Simple: Volume.

  • Pingback: Peopleclick and Authoria Combine In Merger | FixCV.com

  • http://www.careerxroads.com Gerry Crispin

    Jason, you’ve got an instructive and well managed set of comments here to accompany a solid blog- no flames, all rational and well considered. I’m considering that in addition to the consolidation you are noting, there may be a growing maturity that will benefit the employer decision processes. (Then again I may be speaking too soon). Best to you

  • http://blog.hirestrategies.co.uk Peter Gold

    Jason

    Excellent post and synopsis. I think any tech merger is a stew and this will be no different but what option did either have? We are now beginning to see more TM vendors than pure play e-recruitment yet the TM market is still very immature and they are all betting on TM being the answer – which I get.

    Let’s bookmark this post to 2012 and look back then :)

    Peter

  • Jason Corsello

    @Gerry – thanks for your comments. best to you.

    @Peter – I always enjoy looking back at my posts. I wish Bedford luck in blending the 2 companies.

  • Pingback: Wellington Financial Blog - News, Views & Purviews » Blog Archives » Bedford Funding shoots the lights out

  • http://www.staffingtalk.com gregg dourgarian

    Odd the way some comment about .net and j2ee as if that were the grand dichotomy of software development today.

    For a real Leno/Conan brawl html5 vs Silverlight makes for more fun. Throw in AdobeAir for comic relief. And that’s just the UI.

    I love it when private equity gets involved w my competitors. Great analysis in this post and comments. Tx.

  • http://pchousing.com Greg

    Financially driven mergers are so abundant right now, leaving people lost in the transition jobless and out of luck. This is a shame to hear.

  • Mrs. Bryan

    People Click VMS could possibly be the worst system I have ever EVER seen. This products make my life hell.

  • http://twitter.com/humanallianceco Human Alliance

    Great Analysis but any Oracle based ATS or HRIS system is a failure. I’m biased against them. They’re built too much like financial and accounting systems and they SET the process, not facilitate it, Period.

  • Anonymous

    This has some advantageous innovations, including acquaintance management, collision, aliment planning and integration of amusing networks. Management recruiting abject engine is consistently abased on the complication that involves.

  • http://www.sovereignfunding.com sellstructuredsettlement

    I feel that merging two companies can have its advantages and its disadvantages.u00a0 I have to wonder how the working class of people for these companies feel about the merger.u00a0 Has it been in their best interests and how many kept their jobs.u00a0 All too often when companies merge like this, people lose jobs.u00a0 Did that also happen here?

  • Anonymous

    I agree with the comment below. When companies merge people lose jobs……..has this happened?

  • http://www.sovereignfunding.com structuredsettlementbuyer

    Dont all mergers always look good on paper?u00a0 But what will the long term costs be to all involved?

  • http://www.sovereignfunding.com CashforStructuredSettlements

    Great find. Lots of good information.

  • http://www.sovereignfunding.com structuredsettlement

    I agree completely with you.u00a0 Sad to say that most companies when merging with another cut many jobs.u00a0 I feel for the people who lost their jobs due to mergers.

  • http://www.sovereignfunding.com structuredsettlement

    found this to be an interesting read.u00a0 I also agree with other posters about the loss of jobs.u00a0 It is a shame that when corporations merge that it usually isu00a0at the expense of the small man.u00a0 I think too many corporations only see dollar signs.

  • http://webhostinggeeks.com Web Hosting Geek

    Actually, as for me – i didnt see anything unusual that somebody loose their jobs because of merge. I mean it is obvious that merging does mean restructurization in that companies and so that means that somebody will loose their job…

  • http://www.outsource-website-development.com/outsource-drupal-web-developers.html drupal outsource

    I am very happy to find this post very useful for me, as it contains lot of information. I always prefer to read the quality content and this thing I found in you post. I really enjoyed reading this.

  • Boyaciustasi34

    Thank you indeed have a very beautiful work boyaci

  • Pingback: Thought Leaders in Cloud Computing: Adam Miller, CEO of Cornerstone OnDemand | Sramana Mitra

Previous post:

Next post: